Budapest: First Post
Herewith begins the travelogue part of QD5, as I have just arrived in Budapest for Quark Matter (which I've mentioned a few times). It's been quite a few days, from the shores of Amagansett beach visiting my sister & her family for a couple of days, back to New York to do my last-minute errands, and then finally to JFK to begin my trip to Hungary. Of course, things are never that easy, with the usual over-long layover in a random European hub (Brussels this time) and an arrival in a beautiful, but strange city, where people speak a lot more German than English. That said, it was relatively mishap-free to get to my hotel, in the center of the Pest side, and then to find a southbound tram to cross the Danube river. OK, so when you get off the tram, there are no signs or even streets to guide you, but my memory of the conference map was just good enough to nudge me in the right direction towards the Physics and Chemistry building at the university.
Anyway, so here I am, ready and willing to report any and all new wrinkles. This is where the field (RHIC & SPS types both) let loose with the latest and greatest, and it's often quite hard to process in real time (individual collaborations get to have the "huh?[scratch head]" phase for a few months before the conference...not so for the spectators to the new stuff). So bear with me, folks.
Hello.. just droppin' by. By the way I'm Mary Joy from Philippines, a 3rd year Information Technology student. So glad to know that Physicist like you still have time for other stuffs like Blogging. Actually, I never heard of CERN until I read Angels & Demons by Dan Brown. I was so astonished of what I discover about CERN. I even thought of working there... how ambitious I am.. but sad to say I'm not a Physics-geek, I even got low grades in my physics subject. But I am really interested to learn Physics but I prefer to learn it outside the school.. I want to see actual experiments, particles..and everything about it. I hope someday, I can visit CERN and not just visit, I want to be part of it... please email me..padotz69@yahoo.com or padotz69@gmail.com.. Luv to hear from you..
Posted by: mary joy | August 03, 2005 at 06:22 PM
good morning mister Steinberg. I am the same person as marie before but i use my true name: i don't want to be confused, because of the situation (too detailed to be on a blog) with the person named mary. I said to some i had one pseudo marie. It was purely one joke talking of ticket flight but i am wondering if i would induce some idea to some and i wouldn't want your journey would be one travel's agency one.
As i give my true name, can i asked you to transmit my best souvenir to Mister Bolek Wyslouch i met in 1981.I fair he wouldn't be sure to recognyze me as i give my true name. Of course he is belonging to the staff of QM2005.
So i had a quickly look on your topo and i take time because i have something imoportant to add on your yellowred bidule. I get time since at this moment you are "frappant les trois coups " , Gunther Roland talikng of Phobos.
First of all: One idea i got this morning in my house: Biology field: Is it so difficult to introduce ADN NON CODANT in place of CELLULES SOUCHES. What are incrustations of drug in the ADN? I would like something like one confortable information about the relationship beetwen the rate od ADN non codant and the composition of cellules souches compared to others items where is the ADN. The same trip than what we know about the role of mitochondries related to the core of the element. Sending and another one later because i nearly lost this writing because of the net. Thanks for your attention.
Posted by: claire | August 04, 2005 at 06:09 AM
Coming back again: I had one look on all the blog: new mode every body comments the article in public? The last energy spectrum of a relativistic electron beam... in Physical Review Letters linked by Caolionn looks very differently in black and white: one bone with very much arthrose in the kneee..; I confirm the comments i will do latter. I noted perfectly that the man working on one new algorythm is commenting on line in dialogue artefacts and semantics misundertanding in the concepts...Just yesterday.I am not the only one with vocabulary problems and i unnderstand why Gordon watts seems to be preocuppated to know if bloggers are or are not from physics world.. The next time i will send all to the Nobel Price Foundation!!! I explain, for fun. I succeeded with pain because demotivated one Scientific baccalaureat: when i learned in the middle class before the BAC,at the hour having to choice, the teacher said "Les A (littéraires) c'est de la crotte". I swear it is true. So i decided to work again mathematicals. The year before the teacher was one young very timid man always facing the young girls ( i was in province in one lycée only for girls) with one RED face.. So i didn't learn any lesson. The year after at this moment of choice, i had one ZERO in mathematical: i wasn't able to calculate the surface of one circle because of the precedent year but i would have been able to extract the racine carrée of the result of the calculation of the surface du cercle. So i received for all the trimestre the note of 9: the other works where more goods. But they said i was bad. I worked and i was the second one in the class and they put me in the scientific section. But they didn't explain to me the interest or the aim for extracting the racine carrée of the circle. So i was completely demotivated and i got one very bad Baccalaureat. But, as Eintein was in the same situation and succeded to produce good ideas later, i have to send to the Nobel Price Foundation.I think i am logical but i am not sure, knowing the syllogisme of Socrate, that even the logique floue would be consistant with my exposé..Two conclusions: i have one common point with mister Wyslouch: he was received second to the entry to the MIT as student. But in am not really sure it is more logical than the precedent exposé.
Second conclusion: it is a pity: i forgot it as i forgot the extraction of racine carrée.
Posted by: claire | August 04, 2005 at 07:37 AM
oh Mister Steinberg: i am already célèbre like Einstein!!!! You have to come here (logistique for congress very peformante). One journalist of La Voix du Nord is arriving trying to take one picture of the cyber. For one article. I said no picture of me, but i didn't succeeded totally to avoid the camera field on the side. With or without extraction de la racine carree de la surface du cercle.
So you know i was right even not logical.
16 h 40 : for the hour of my celebrity!!!
Posted by: claire | August 04, 2005 at 07:43 AM
Conclusion after interferences: i think and i have already said it: physicists wear one new paradygme for the biology, specially when they define some strange exotic new gas or liquid like state of matter containing in their definition more than all the biology field itself to impulse new way in hypothesis in this one.
I read yesterday one brief article on the variability of WEAK force.. I am sure i will be pleased to connect my feeling to the TINIES variations and their location on your yellowred bidule. For external peoples it is crazy to receive it without any explanation about one eventual link with one part of another or precedent representations we got on the net. But it is your job. Not public. Physics world looks like one opened to every body without the mode d'emploi: You talk together from one to one like one reality show that we can't understand.
Thanks for your attention. For the truth i felt desesperated and this time not for fun when i heard dysfonctionements in France into the keeping procedures of foetus in Hospital: A few weeks ago a lot of laboratories recognyzed publicly that they arranged their results to publish in response to one inquiry of Insttitut Pasteur. I remember the day i was in Jussieu scientific library, i talked of this there and it was at the moment of the Hadron Collider.
Posted by: claire | August 04, 2005 at 08:37 AM
Greatest comments ever!
Posted by: Ian | August 04, 2005 at 10:34 PM
Good morning Mister Steinberg: i am really célèbre: only important peoples are corrected indirectly: i made one terrible mistake employing fair and not to fear, and, the most terrible, adressing to Mister Bolek Wyslouch i respect so much. And Mister David Waller has entitled FAIR WEATHER PHYSICISTS. Take care of this, boys and girls: I would prefer you would say it directly to me, i am crazy with my english: i FEAR one day i would announce TURLUTUTU and every body would repeat TURLUTUTU. Not even TURLUTATA.
So, FAIRY ENGLISH would be translated ANGLAIS FOIREUX. Next one probably. Claire B. You are allowed to drink one bottle of TOKAI to the health of, i don't know what or whom, exactly. And to give us good views of Quark Matter.
Posted by: claire | August 05, 2005 at 05:38 AM
grave crisis: i wrote my god about Monte Carlo (one french song: tu n'as pas vu monte carlo, non je n'ai vu monter personne..)my god.
Scientifics would have found the hormone of the believing in god, and the croyance "fashions" you as the same as you are able to live more later...
I would have been better to take time to read about vieillissement in Monte Carlo statistiques. I retire my god for ever. I should have to pry for ... What? I am born Athée and i didn't ever succeed to find any logical appearance inside the idea of god.
i think i will hate Monte Carlo statistique.
Posted by: claire | August 11, 2005 at 09:12 AM
Good afternoon mister Steinberg: you are informed that one precious text disappeared twice on the blog i wanted to comment: Gordon Watts.
So new version with one introduction:
I found in the archiv of the French army ( copy to sell, only to sell, and the French government will go in law against me because i am out of the fair use: fair means blond. Bolek, how complicated is the life in english when you produce one mistake! i will answer to the French government, i am selling the valeur ajoutée: the time to find it again in my old and rich so in consequence complicated personnal archivs..i have always good cards.). The telephone was in ballons, not planes, very early. Who can say the date? it is a play: the answer: 1912. I am wrong of one year in my memory it is nothing.
So now one pittoresque interpretation of Monte Carlo statistique: The challenger is perhaps wrong with Gordon Watts: 0 = 1 true was one test of condition in ORACLE/SQL procedures in one stage of me. But i think to a bad joke of FERMILAB. Nevertheless, as i am not physicist i have the right to comment that it is a good approach of instantaneous phenomens but without any concrete aim.
Another subject: years ago there was one escroquerie in one famous scientific but popular review you use sometimes: One antiquaire sold old prehistorical statues supposed found in Amiens county. These last hours i heard two informations which had droven me to think to this inquiry in the french or european laboratories about the fiability of the results papers. Nearly all recognyzed they "biaisent" (no distorsion of understanding: this is the term employed in the article and B.I.A.I.S.E.N.T.: French proverbe: comme on connait ses saints on les adore )the presentation of the facts or items or all what you want. It was clearly said in one article about téléportation of one atome, only one.Did everybody comment, perhaps in one Dutch or other langague i didn't translmate (missing time) the last observations of SAUT D'ELECTRON in HAMBURG? Perhaps i is so stupid it was in one paper i printed to read it later..i am not physicist: i have the right to stay stupid.This is not mine domain.Or perhaps it is stupid to consider this after 1912.
So what's about now?
Another comment onto the 2 informations.
Posted by: claire | August 12, 2005 at 06:37 AM
The prehistorical human had invented the roller using of one machoire of, forgot it, dinausore? I believed the French gaulois had invented the ROUE. And the Chinese the CHAR MAGNETIQUE.
During the Guerre D'Algerie the death pain was suppressed: it is not a play this time. This dedicated to a very empathic boss, old one and perhaps dead now, i worked with. He said one time, when you work with one C.... boss, you create c..... work. With all this who help to say which year the death pain in France was suppressed? I remember this clivage in law , i mean the plaidoirie of Robert Badinter to avoid it to a sort of serial killer. Civil society problem. And during this time of crisis terrorist like and decolonisation and torture, they would have suppressed it ofr the ennemy. I can agree that history is full of paradoxes, but....Peter Steinberg, you wrote recently about QM2005, you would be able to mistake the assistance ,i understood, naïvement...
Please everybody one effort of rigueur for us.
Posted by: claire | August 12, 2005 at 06:48 AM
Sorry for the orthographe: people here are waiting for one place.
Posted by: claire | August 12, 2005 at 06:49 AM