« workaholic | Main | In Venice on a summer sunday »

June 19, 2005

Comments

Alejandro

Is this an anniversary celebration? The previous D0 measure, the one driving t up to 178 +-4 GeV, was published 10 June 2004. To be precise,
Nature 429, 638 - 642 (10 June 2004); doi:10.1038/nature02589

Tommaso Dorigo

Yup... Well, the CDF measurement was released 1.5 months ago. I decided to describe this since I have this nice new plot and have just given a seminar on related topics last week.

BTW the plot is courtesy Beate Heinemann.

socratus

100 years of Einstein's SRT.
100 years have passed from the date of creation of SRT.
Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written and the
United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT.
Considering all that is clear in this theory, one must still
continue to be surprised by its unusual aspects
Lets review it again:
1. SRT is based on two postulates:
a) According to classical mechanics, physical processes,
which occur in rest or in a rectilinearly driven reference system
are described under the same laws.
b) The rectilinear - uniform propagation of a quantum of light (c=1) in vacuo
has a constant magnitude and does not depend on the source of radiation.
These two postulates would be proven if in the final analysis, they corresponded
with Galilean transformations. However, the result appears negative.
Galilean transformations do not unite these two theories. Why?
2. The rectilinear - uniform motion of a quantum of light (c=1) is connected with
Maxwell's classical electrodynamics. SRT has grown from Maxwell's electrodynamics
and main component in it is the electron.
What describes the electron in Maxwell's electrodynamics?
It is natural, that this electron should be in motion, but it does not move rectilinearly.
It rotates around its own diameter ( spin of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck)
and such a rotation creates electrical waves. In such rotation all geometrical
and physical parameters of the electron are changed.
It is for this reason Einstein utilized the Lorentz transformations.
And all that is sensible in SRT is that it examines two completely
different types of movement: rectilinear (quantum of light c=1)
and rotational (Maxwell's electron).
It examines the transformation of the electron into a quantum of light (photon)
or quantum of light into an electron .
3. According to classical electrodynamics, an electron in rectilinear motion
does not create electrical waves. Why?
Because the electron travels as a quantum of light (c=1).
In such movement its geometrical form is a circle.
In such movement its area of contact with the vacuum is minimal
and it is not capable of changing the uniformity of the vacuum.
4. When the electron rotates around its own diameter, its speed is more
than the rectilinear motion of a quantum of light. Its speed is c > 1.
For this reason physicists ascribe a huge frequency
to the electron which is the reason its energy E =ħ is higher.
* * *
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site
http://www.socratus.com
Best regards.
Socratus.

manuel visaya

nice grub guitar playing is called for here? this was posted here earlier too. (a virtual sighting)

Gordon T Watts

You guys did a good job on the top mass! When I first saw the LEPEWWG's plots I couldn't help but wonder if anyone was running, gleefully, around the halls saying "Gee, I wonder if LEP missed the Higgs." Obviously, it is very unlikely as the LEP folks are very good, but I couldn't help but smile at the thought.

Frank Morgan

since my theory says all measurable energy is electron energy, and that all directly detectible particles are multiples of the helical string electron whose constant mass is equal to Planck's constant, h, in grams, I think the quark is dimensionally-inferred single degree of vibratory freedom of the electron wave motion as it proceeds as propagating helix of Higgs particles that give it mass. An up, down, right, left,forward and backward directions inference of an ever-vibratory movement of the Higgs wave array. Science is totally lost still in the white noise of the energy of the small with no way to really parse the detailed mechanics. FIND THE HIGGs by inference techniques as I have done in plain language

The comments to this entry are closed.